This is a nice way to communicate concern in the community and I a will always be on team communication.

From my reading and understanding though this whole issue is built on a lie or a miss understanding. I am leaning towards lie which presents motive because of the way it was done though.

There has never been a promise or a statement that the foundation will be disbanding in 2 years. This has to be understood by all. This simple fact makes all of this confusion very unneccary.

The fact is that a regent account was created at the start of blurt and transparently communicated that it was here. This accounts sole purpose was to vote for trusted witnesses. Trust does not mean controllable or a cabal, I know many of the witness are individuals that share different ideas of how blurt should be and how they use blurt. But the trust is in that they will not hijack blurt or allow blurt to be hijacked by the likes of justin sun or some whale here that did not get his way in controlling how people use their stake and now wants to push his will.

This regent account will have 0 weight in voting for witnesses by next month. And if I understand correctly most of this weight is already gone, so little will change in the witness voting as it is now organically transitioned into real voter weights.

But if as a community we feel that we need to still have this regent account to safe guard the chain from attacks like we are seeing now then we can vote to lengthen the term of the regent.