The plan for inactive blurt

in blurt •  3 years ago 

received_1009413936477766.gif

Here's who have never used are going to have their accounts nuked.

At least, that is what I would like to do. We have treated Binance the same way that we have treated our Werner or our Freakeao or our other users. Or myself.

But we gave them blurt and they never used it they made a single transaction. There are probably over a million users who have never made a single transaction.

It is time.

received_2907206269542642.gif

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE BLURT!
Sort Order:  
  ·  3 years ago  ·  

I have created a community voting post on this matter so that the community can have their say and vote for what they feel is right for them https://blurt.blog/blurt/@megadrive/impromptu-community-vote-unclaimed-blurt-burn

  ·  3 years ago  ·  

I think differently.
Whether they are used or not.
If they have coins, then they are already investors.
It would not be wise to throw them away and deprive them of their personal investment.
It's just that no one will invest the next time, knowing that their coins may be lost.
It's my opinion .

  ·  3 years ago  ·   (edited)

If they have coins, then they are already investors. deprive them of their personal investment.

Out of curiosity, if they've never invested money and never transacted once on the chain, what is it you believe they invested?

  ·  3 years ago  ·  

It's better to nuke it, to decrease the total amount of blurt and will help increase the value of blurt long term.

Hardworking blurt bloggers will continue what they do best, is to blog and earn. This is how this community will become independent and will continue to flourish.

IMHO.

  ·  3 years ago  ·  

I think it is the best for everyone, I agree with you.

  ·  3 years ago  ·  

Or you take all the blurt from the inactive accounts that never made a single transaction and make a second airdrop for all active accounts that had at least one transaction in the last 7 days in the same amount. So as a small loyalty bonus.

Otherwise I have nothing against a total destruction. :D

USSJ_Vegeta_VS_Cell_Final_Flash_REMASTERED.gif

  ·  3 years ago  ·  

The plan would be to remint on Cosmos part to validators, part as liquidity pool seeding and part as airdrop on attested accounts.

  ·  3 years ago  ·  

💯

  ·  3 years ago  ·  

Totally agree with this post, I even think it is something that should be done immediately, in addition to that I understand that the community should be informed, but it is also necessary to make decisions even if they are radical that can improve the outlook of the platform.

Congratulations, your post has been curated by @r2cornell-curate. You can use the tag #R2cornell. Also, find us on Discord

Manually curated by @blessed-girl

logo3 Discord.png

Felicitaciones, su publicación ha sido votada por @r2cornell-curate. Puedes usar el tag #R2cornell. También, nos puedes encontrar en Discord

  ·  3 years ago  ·  

Please Don’t Nuke them…. Just take them and redistribute to all active Blurt Bloggers… everyone who has blogged once a day for the past week gets 100,000 Blurt !

  ·  3 years ago  ·  

The plan would be to remint on Cosmos part to validators, part as liquidity pool seeding and part as airdrop on attested accounts.

is there a lot of blurt in different accounts ? are there lakhs or millions ?

  ·  3 years ago  ·  

probably around 80 million in unclaimed blurt on exchange accounts alone, unclaimed user blurt much more.

  ·  3 years ago  ·  

Just move them all into a temporary Curation Holding Account. If they come looking for them when Blurt hits $10 then they can claim them at that time
.

  ·  3 years ago  ·  

There is still the optics of increased siloed total supply, also becomes an admin nightmare that could be exploited.

  ·  3 years ago  ·  

How about adding them to a fund like DHF? That way BLURT has the ability to pay for many things including its own marketing if needed.

  ·  3 years ago  ·  

It is good to read that decisions are being made that need to be made in order to push the blockchain forward. from today onwards it is only necessary to accelerate the pace in order to renew this blockchain

  ·  3 years ago  ·  

Interesting 🤔

Yeah the only question is whether we do it here or we do it on a cosmos flavored blurt. People who didn't transact shouldn't enter the new chain. that's just crazy talk.

Lucky for me I'm old enough to know that I don't always make the right decisions and own up to it when I don't and in this case, we were actually pioneers at blurt. To my knowledge, blurt was the largest airdrop ever.

And what we did not do is implement any measure to ensure that only people who would use the platform would receive blurt.

More so than any technical failure, I believe that this is responsible for the current economic situation.

Worse, blurt was founded upon solving controversies that relate to the nuking of funds.

And now I have come full circle.

I would lean towards doing this on a new Cosmos flavored Blurt. I would not do an airdrop though.

I think Steem had a @null account for burning funds. Perhaps a Python script could be written to watch that address and send funds to the users Cosmos Blurt account if people burned Blurt.

Early adopters of the new chain would benefit and inactive accounts would not be an issue on the new chain. People could use both chains and transition over as they see fit.

  ·  3 years ago  ·  

That's a nice idea, I like burn and mint. But it can be used for a form of a bridge.

  ·  3 years ago  ·  

This is a great summary of the situation, very insightful.