It's actually totally fine for people to power down and sell their stake. It is their property. I literally straight up defend their right to do that.
RE: No’s
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
No’s
Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE BLURT!
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE BLURT!
I agree with you its everyones own decission to do with his property what he likes to do, even when someone dislikes it for whatever reason.
Let them sell everything and go back to Hive or Steemit. If they don’t like Blurt they should just leave. The end.
Please consider:
there's not only hive and steemit, there's much more.
Some people came here to invest and some came for the community and some came here to farm and if we start to say that some blurt is lesser than other blurt we kill the whole blurt.
There seem to be 2 very distinct Communities here in Blurt …
Blurt A: Some form of Centralized ? governance with Blurt Developers + Witnesses: megadrive, rycharde , saboin, tekraze, zahid, Angelica7, Eastmael, Bestkizito, offgridlife, etc, etc…
Blurt B: Decentralized Anarchy … double-u, ctime, MK, mmmkkk351, Mariuszkarowski, phusionphil, lucylin, jerkoff, frot, fervi, Yvonne-b, others ?
Is there also a Blurt C ?
Maybe we need 2 more Blockchains or Steemit Forks so that people can go where they will be happy ?
I'd strongly put myself on the anarchy team
I don't wanna control this thing, that was never the goal.
Ok… maybe someone could build a new Anarchy version of Steemit-Hive-Blurt … no rules, governance, witnesses, developers. Could you build this on Cosmos ?
Some anarchist legal theorists hold that an ideal anarchist society should be based strictly on natural law and mutual aid, which require no social contract. However, many anarchist theorists completely reject natural law as capitalistic and man made.
Seems funny that they are the first to call foul and run to the man for help and centralized legal system.
Yea… I have been saying this for days. But nobody really cares.
Nobody really cares about Decentralization or Anarchy. It’s all about Greed.
What did the Anarchist say when someone suggested a Community Rule about hate speech?
If you impose a single rule I’m calling my Lawyer.
If the majority would like hate speech, it means they know the risks.
Are you still living with your parents? After all, they know better than you on many subjects. So should they decide your life forever?
You are getting common law and natural law mixed up I think. Natural law is 'god-given' and common law is manmade but based on the 'god-given' law.
God-given ????
What if you don’t Believe in a God ????
Natural law is a theory in ethics and philosophy that says that human beings possess intrinsic values that govern their reasoning and behavior. Natural law maintains that these rules of right and wrong are inherent in people and are not created by society or court judges.
In law, common law, also known as judicial precedent, judge-made law, or case law, is the body of law created by judges and similar quasi-judicial tribunals by virtue of being stated in written opinions.
The defining characteristic of “common law” is that it arises as precedent. In cases where the parties disagree on what the law is, a common law court looks to past precedential decisions of relevant courts, and synthesizes the principles of those past cases as applicable to the current facts.
If a similar dispute has been resolved in the past, the court is usually bound to follow the reasoning used in the prior decision (a principle known as stare decisis). If, however, the court finds that the current dispute is fundamentally distinct from all previous cases (called a "matter of first impression"), and legislative statutes are either silent or ambiguous on the question, judges have the authority and duty to resolve the issue (one party or the other has to win, and on disagreements of law, judges make that decision).
The court states an opinion that gives reasons for the decision, and those reasons agglomerate with past decisions as precedent to bind future judges and litigants.
Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_law#Basic_principles_of_common_law
Whether you believe in a God or not natural law is basic common sense but not written down (unless you count the 10 commandments) whereas common law is written down. Judges have nothing to do with common law, a jury does tho. Judges just oversee the process.
👋 I'll be BLURT C 🥓
What are the other Options ?
Options are good. It’s better people find their community.
If someone is unhappy on Blurt it is better that they look elsewhere … don’t you think ?
Isn’t it better to be happy than unhappy ?
People should go where they will be happy.
The difference is blurt was built on a premise of free speech, people invested here because they liked the founders vision…. The vision changed once they started freezing accounts on personal opinion. This was supposed to be the one Safe harbour people thought let’s give this one more go. Of course ppl won’t go back to hive for free speech. Maybe if someone forks blurt who doesn’t want to freeze accounts based on personal opinion people might rly have a choice.
Yes… maybe @fervi can create a new Fork for a 100% Decentralized Version. You need to find 2-3 developers who believe in complete Anarchy, no controls, no centralized governance or rules. Total anarchy … the Anarchist Community needs to get organized and Build it.
erm
anyone on today's current blurt, can do anything that pleases them, on today's current blurt.
That is the point of blurt.
That’s good to hear. I personally don’t mind rules that are written with code, the code to me is what makes something decentralised rather than manual opinion of one person / one small group of people. I mean we all have our own opinions but I think a lot of people come hwre because blurt was advertised as a free speech platform. So it’s essentially going against its own advertising if it starts freezing accounts based on opinions.
All of this comment activity (mainly from Jacob dropping by) is PROOF that discord and other chat channels are a KEY cause of problems...
In my humble opinion. 🤬🥓
I think things like Telegram, Discord, Slack, etc are Fine, but invariably end up causing...
Wait for it...
DISCORD
I favor BLURT because I am The Mistaken Anarchist.
Hmmm….
Well we have Witnesses, developers, centralized exchanges with KYC requirements, (email) and certain rules here don’t we ?
You underestimate my intellect. I designed such a system yesterday that solves these problems completely.
I guess you don't know what is freedom of speech the very meaning of DPoS. What do you have to natural law and Slavic brothers who guard their own and property? Everyone has the right to their own place, we are able to do a lot to attract many and capital. What right do you have to block investors who selflessly support the community? A bunch of sellout mongrels without principles just to get in the ass for a dime hive destroyers of human dignity....
I guess you should not care now you are after all building your decentralization or not buy this and that. You utter words unworthy of their meaning....
You are a two-faced mongrel....
https://blurt.blog/decentralization-day/@mariuszkarowski/paid-by-megadrive-s-so-called-foundation-troll-at-work
Sorry, but I'm translating sentences...
yep