I honestly think the POWER of who recieves vote rewards needs to left SOLELY in the hands of investors aka curating voters. THIS Coal List although under good intentions, takes away OUR POWER TO DECIDE who we want to give votes to. VOTES are not guaranteed so the presmise that they must take away the ability to earn from posts is somewhat presumptious. I understand trying to deal with plagiarism is a problem for the CREATORS of stuff, but again, the other users here should be able to know whats worth voting for and whats not. Just my opinions.
RE: Rather than COAL : Blurt’s 9 circles of Hell.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Rather than COAL : Blurt’s 9 circles of Hell.
Yes. The COAL list is a slippery slope. It’s just that sometimes people profit from the stolen work and even identity theft of others. How do you deal with that ?
How would you like it of I create a new account @greenhousradio and started posting all your work as if i was you ? …. Your art, your podcasts, your posts …. you make peanuts but for some strange reason I make $1,000 per post from your work ? Then I start posting stolen photos of you and telling people that I am you and start scamming them for all kinds of stuff .. what should we do with this type of thing ?