I think nobody here trusts anybody. It's a problem of the digital business where people are asked to prove their work, for a lack of personal contacts, contracts and availability, for example.

The problem I see to give proof of work to the public is that if the public does not understand the technicalities of this work it won't perceive it as proven. Also, lack of technical understanding leads to insecurity.

Witnesses who don't really know their stuff, but who do know something about advertising and emotional influence, talk in the subjunctive or in future terms about their beautiful plans for improving the functions, and the untrained amateur may be impressed by the technical terms with which under-skilled witnesses decorate their blog posts.

If I have the impression that some witnesses are more at the level of a learner who sees the whole thing here rather as a training programme for his still-to-be-trained skills, it would be more appropriate on the part of the public and the founders who pay these witnesses not to continue paying the inexperienced if they cannot deliver the performance for which they are being compensated. Or to make a sliding scale in payment that differentiates between improving the functions and maintaining a server, for example.

I, as someone without technical understanding in code etc. , am a "dumb" user. In order to trust a platform like this, I need a space where I can go with one click and see the stats and numbers not only listed in tech jargon but also translated into language a lay person understands. If that would be already enough, I don't know. Probably not for me personally. I usually don't put any trust into digital relationships where I would risk money I can't spend just for the fun of it.
So I conclude that there must be a centralized team which can estimate the skills of their paid staff.

Still, when I am here for the mere fun of it (like in a casino) I need the casino to run working tables.

So far no one reacted to my question why I get a cartoon figure when I try to access certain user accounts. Any witness have an answer on that?

People are used to get information at a prominent and central place. One serves it better otherwise trust is going down even more. When I open blurt page, I shall immediately get directed to data/stats/proposals etc.

It's already one too many of a button I must press and also no self explaining term for a dumb user when he is able to find the side bar. Easy information must be at the front page which opens up and must appear in a more prominent way. But all I find is "hot, trending, new". That is such a poor design and landing way for dumb users.

You seem to know quite a bit about technicalities. Whom of the witnesses do you think it makes sense to ask? I know no one of them.