Some animals have less reading comprehension than others...
I am talking about the "self sovereign blog" function, only available on blurtblog, which stops an account from being able to comment/reply on any of your posts. Blurt's owners put this in place so they could stop certain people (like lucylin) from being able to express an opinion on community issues. It has nothing to do with the mute feature, which doesn't censor anyone, or stop anyone from saying what they want. I have you and a few other pointless trolls muted to improve my own experience on the platform, but it doesn't stop you from being able to say what you want, and doesn't stop everyone else from seeing your nonsense. As you should be able to grasp, you're still able to comment on my posts. Normally I don't see you, but I'm currently testing BeBlurt, which apparently doesn't have the "self sovereign blog" censorship option, nor does it even support the regular muting feature. I doubt you were able to understand this, but here it is for other readers.
It is hard defending the indefensible so I understand why you are tying yourself in knots trying to justify the blurt brand of mute censorship.
I don't think you grasp it at all.
But what can you expect from a man who can't organise a simple flight? Moronic.