You have to consider that most people didn't speak out because they were skeptical, they simply refused, if they could, if they couldn't for whatever reason, they are passed off as if they made that choice willingly. In the end the loudest minority was the ones with the overwhelming majority of the news and media, who were in a similar predicament as the people who didn't speak out simply because they were skeptical, and much like they didn't have the credentials to speak about it for the most part they didn't even have the data to do so and they simply went along with the smearing of experts contrary to the narrative. All that is changing, now both experts and the data are being heard and the proponents of the coof and jabs are exposed either by their silence, evasion, or their own false claims.
RE: New Variant is Resistant to Immunity, to Current Treatment, BUT not the untested Booster, that is Effective..
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
New Variant is Resistant to Immunity, to Current Treatment, BUT not the untested Booster, that is Effective..
I am wondering where it is going , is it to stop those firms , is it to put people in jail or is it like DO KWON with LUNA a way to stop people speaking too much and give them something to chew on , but even if a judge sees the case nothing will happen. That is mostly what happens with people with power and money .
We are talking Many Billions of $ , any judges can be bought at few millions $
I dont believe in justice when it comes to high level Gangsters .
You see ..Pfizer and J&J already went to court and paid high amount in lawsuits , shouldnt they be not allowed to make vaccins today ? so fishy
I posted it to point out that the judges weren't bought. If they hadn't settled then they may have been more liable, but then it might have been about stacking the jury and eliminating the plaintiffs.
I will go with ...Eliminating the plaintifs