That's why we attacking Blurt.blog but well you can still voting using blurtlatam.
I personally believe that the problem of abuse is complex and should be automated and limited.
To detect plagiarism and copyright infringement, but it should work on the principle of innocent until proven guilty, i.e. the bot should simply inform in a comment that identical content was found here and here and that it was marked as plagiarism and if you want to stop receiving messages, you must e.g. within a week confirm in some way that it is you.
If this does not happen, then your account is marked as a plagiarist's account and your profile goes to the list of plagiarists along with a detailed description of what you copied. But absolutely without any blocking of voting opportunities.
Such a list can then be available as an advanced plagiarism detection tool for anyone who would like to make a claim for stolen work and be able to pursue such claims on this website with the appropriate law enforcement authorities.
The creators of the blockchain, its administrators or users should not participate in the administration of justice in ANY way because, firstly, they are not the body appointed for this purpose, and secondly, facts can be easily manipulated to the detriment of the user who could, for example, be innocent but his reputation has already suffered.
Thanks for the info. I think you're right that we already have appropriate ways of dealing with these problems, and marking/neutering users is not the right course.
Sadly, I can't use BeBlurt because of their "unknown user" glitch. And I can't use blurtlatam because comments and posts won't go through. Apparently BeBlurt is working on a fix sometime this year.
blurtbooster (same gang, different name)....just loooooooove upvoting AI generated text - no problemo ...hmmm...