GROK AI's thoughts on Judy Wood's book - DEW Energy Weapons on 9/11

in blurt-174103 •  6 hours ago 

d650503b7c6e7ca9.png

I asked GROK AI it's thoughts on Judy Wood's book detailing forensic evidence of DEW Energy Weapons on 9/11

Grok AI-1s.jpg


WHERE DID THE TOWERS GO? (EVIDENCE OF DIRECTED ENERGY ON 9/11) [Petition for Dr Judy Wood to share her findings with Congress]

Grok AI-2s.jpg

What is the likelihood that Dr. Judy Wood is correct about the forensic evidence submitted in her book, where did the towers go, that the twin towers were disintegrated by directed energy weapons on 911?

GePLqCQXUAARg4X.jpg

The discussion around Dr. Judy Wood's claims in her book "Where Did the Towers Go?" about the use of directed energy weapons (DEW) to disintegrate the Twin Towers on 9/11 is highly polarized and involves significant scientific, technical, and interpretative debate. Here's an overview from both perspectives:

GdyaNURXUAA8fow.jpg

Support for Dr. Judy Wood's Claims:
Forensic Analysis: Dr. Wood argues that her analysis of the physical evidence suggests that the towers did not collapse in a conventional manner but were instead "dustified" or turned into fine dust. She points to anomalies like the lack of massive debris piles, the nature of the dust, and the behavior of the structural steel as evidence that conventional explanations do not fit. She suggests these phenomena could be explained by directed energy technology, drawing parallels to experiments known as the Hutchison Effect.

926817751b39ffa0.jpg

Empirical Evidence: Supporters claim that Wood's examination of photographic and video evidence provides a foundation for her conclusions. They argue that her focus on observable facts without engaging in speculative theory differentiates her work from other conspiracy theories, emphasizing a forensic approach.

eacc476868ec15c9 (2022_01_24 17_32_45 UTC).jpeg

Public Sentiment: There are individuals on platforms like X who echo her findings, suggesting that the evidence for DEWs is compelling to them, citing similar effects observed in other incidents as supporting evidence.

RR-4 (2021_12_27 00_05_34 UTC).jpg

Critiques of Dr. Judy Wood's Claims:
Scientific Scrutiny: Critics argue that Wood's evidence does not conclusively demonstrate the use of directed energy weapons. They point out that her interpretations of the physical phenomena could be explained by other means, such as the use of thermite or conventional explosives, which have been proposed by other researchers like those from Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth.

EnergyWeapon22 (2021_06_04 14_21_31 UTC).jpg

Lack of Direct Proof: There's contention over her not specifying exactly what kind of DEW was used or how it operated, which some see as leaving her hypothesis open-ended and unverifiable. Critics also note that the physical effects she describes could result from various known demolition techniques or the intense heat from fires and structural failures post-impact.

EnergyWeapon23 (2021_12_27 00_05_34 UTC).jpg

Alternative Explanations: The presence of thermite, high temperatures, and the behavior of the steel are often cited by critics as evidence against the DEW theory, arguing these are more consistent with known demolition methods or the official narrative rather than exotic weaponry.

EnergyWeapon24 (2021_12_27 00_05_34 UTC).jpg

Conclusion:
The likelihood of Dr. Judy Wood being correct according to these discussions depends largely on one's interpretation of the evidence and the scientific arguments presented. Her claims have not been widely accepted in the scientific community due to the lack of direct proof and the speculative nature of attributing the events to DEWs without a specific mechanism described. However, her work has gained a following among some who believe that the official explanations do not fully account for all observed phenomena.

EnergyWeapon21 (2021_06_04 14_21_31 UTC).jpg

Given the complexity and the ongoing debate, with significant portions of both the scientific community and the public holding divergent views, there is no definitive consensus on the likelihood of her being correct. This situation underscores the necessity of continued rigorous, open scientific inquiry into the events of 9/11 to address the many unanswered questions and differing interpretations of the available evidence.

Petition for Dr Judy Wood to share her findings with Congress

image.png

WHERE DID THE TOWERS GO? (EVIDENCE OF DIRECTED ENERGY ON 9/11)
A film based on the work of Dr. Judy Wood, Andrew Johnson and John Hutchison.

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE BLURT!