He still cares about Blurt, but he has other things to take care of, so we only hear from him once in a while.
I will forward to him the link to this post so he can read it.
RE: Possible new methods for Blurt image storage
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Possible new methods for Blurt image storage
thanks, it's good to know he's still with us
Hi @mariuszkarowski I am still around thank you for asking after me, I appreciate it.
I like that the community is moving forward without me, this is as it should be. I am still around to help steer things on an ad-hoc basis.
I believe that we have reached the point where without you we can no longer do much more on our own. Now is the moment when we should forget about old arguments and focus on how to push Blurt to a new level, especially since @agorise is planning to build some new things here, and in his chat you can find out that his dev team is even able to complete planned hardforks.
https://blurt.pl/en/roadmap.php
That's why I invite you to Blurt Matrix. It is worth talking, even if nothing would come out of it
Hi Marius, thank you so much for your kind response, it does mean a lot to me. Please consider the past forgotten, we will forever be allies from this point on.
For transparency, I am hoping Blurt will flourish without me in time, I am however happy to help steer things to the point Blurt is self-sufficient.
I have joined the Matrix chat which already sounds promising, I have a good history with both Kencode and Jackalprotocol.