I don't know if such posts deserve triangle, but I think the community has the right to know if a post is written by AI or not. It would be best if you ran a bot that will leave a comment under the posts of accounts that use AI. Then everyone will decide for themselves - to vote or not not to vote
RE: Ai content spam #2
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Ai content spam #2
A red triangle isn't just a warning by any chance? I have seen a few accounts that have one and can be voted on normally. Censorship is not the goal, more the ethics of voting. Accounts to ban or mute are not wanted.
a comment bot would be a great warning, till the author mutes the bot and no one will see it, unless your on blurtlatam.intinte.org
But i still would like a bot like that myself. When i get a pc...
@matthew1 thanks for the heads up. I'll check up onviy as well one by one thoroughly as i know how. If it proves to be sufficient evidence ill post it on my community account to welcome them through invite as its a free speech community. . But will be marked as ai content status to warn others and give notice about voting etiquette. No sense in censorship as i see it. If people dont endorse it, it will die off on its own, buuut who in blurt foundation looking into these things periodically?
Yep, censorship is unnecessary. It is about the very fact of ethics and access to information. E.g. I don't see a problem with AI writing when it is flagged in a post. What's more, while looking for parallels of AI writing scripts, I've written posts without publication myself and found that it's possible to write an interesting attention-grabbing post with it. You just have to try a bit harder and not just type "Write me a post about XYZ".